For the record, The Inspector does not believe that native speakers should be placed on a pedestal. Non native speakers can do just as good a job, especially if you don't believe in the sanctity of the communicative method. The issue of work permits and visas is hardly the fault of language schools. Employing exclusively native speakers is however another matter.
"Does anyone believe that a E.U. sponsored monopoly is begınnıng to take hold on the ESL industry? More and more jobs are statıng, ''British speaker wanted,'' or ''Only E.U. citizens may apply''. I personally believe all schools should have a corporate policy against non-dıscrimination based on natıonality for ESL and should pressure centers to accept natıve speakers from non-E.U. countrıes. For example, what give British citizens a majority hold over a country such as Romania. My family left Romania in 1947 because of the Communists, and I am told that because I am not an E.U. citizen I cannot apply. Personally, despıte beıng a certified instructor, I am consıstently turned down for jobs because the Eastern European centers are unwılling to sponsor a vısa or they say that the requırements are ımpossıble to meet for US citizens. The other common response is ''part-time'' or ''freelance'' which is easily translatable as - no visa support, no health insurance, no housing, no teacher permit, thus no legality. These gray areas of national law can easily cause an inexperienced teacher to be deported or detained. I have personally witnessed this situation take place on more than one occasion. A manager can act as though these really arent a concern, but they should be of grave concern to any illegal worker in any industry. What any company is doing with this type of structure is not attract professional teachers, but persons who may be in the country under special circumstances, i.e. married to a resident, university student, etc. I don't believe this situation adds value to the corporation, instead it detracts from what is important - retaining qualified and interested individuals. One of the reasons why ESL seems to attract the ''backpackers''. Why should British citizens be the only nationality sanctioned to teach English in the E.U.?"
_________________________________________________________
Inspector McHammered of the Lard in Pamplona, Spain
6 comments:
Inspector,
Have you ever used a non-English keyboard to type a letter? Spelling errors and grammatical errors will be every third word; if you are fortunate to catch more than 85% then you are lucky. Try typing on an Arabic, Turkish, Chinese, etc. keyboard and see how you do.
It is the school's fault if they promise visas and permits in their advertisement and contract knowing fully well that the visas and permits are unattainable. Full disclosure!
"Why should British citizens be the only nationality sanctioned to teach English in the E.U.?"
They're not. What about the Irish?
School owners are always going to take the easy route. Visa sponsorship takes time and money. There are also EU work and immigration laws to consider.
As a British national, would a school in the US employ me over an American? Thought not.
No, because we all speak English! You Brits are hypocrits, you are against the EU Constitution, you refuse to accept the Euro, and you reject neighboring countries bids to join even though you dont supoport integration. C'mon you are wither the United States of Europe or you remain a second rate lost Empire. The point is you have no more right to teach English in these countries than Americans because you reject the premise of the E.U. to begin with.
You presume the Irish want your English to begin with. We don't!
Maybe they're after the Working Holiday visa?
Post a Comment